True compassion and prudence. December 2019 Newsletter of the Physicians’ Alliance against Euthanasia

Related image

Dear friends,

On September 11, 2019, Quebec Superior Court judge Christine Baudouin ruled that the prohibition of “medical assistance in dying” of people who are not at the “end of life” (in the Quebec law) or whose death is not “reasonably foreseeable” ( Canadian law) is unconstitutional. Elated by its victory, the death lobby is now pressing the Prime Minister to weaken the law even further by removing the requirement that a person be capable of consenting to the euthanasia at the time of their death.

The scenario envisaged in the news reports is that of someone, having requested euthanasia, losing the capacity to consent as their condition deteriorates. But euthanasia activists are also pressing for lethal injection for people incapable of decision-making because of cognitive disorders who expressed a desire for it by advance directive.

Concurrently, a Quebec government committee released its report on November 29, 2019, recommending euthanasia by advance directive in both these situations. Federal Justice Minister David Lametti also announced on December 11 his intention of considering this possibility. Continue reading editorial…


Canadian news:

Legislation regarding medical assistance in dying:

  • In September, the Quebec Superior Court declared the reasonably foreseeable death clause in federal law unconstitutional and ordered Ottawa to change its law by March. As already known, the Trudeau government did not appeal this amendment and was planning on introducing a bill this Spring (March 2020) to revise its law on medical assistance to die by removing the ‘reasonably foreseeable death clause’. Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau has mandated Justice Minister David Lametti to work with the Patty Hajdu, the Federal Health Minister to work on the reform based on the September court decision.
  • In an interview with Radio-Canada (available in French only) on Wednesday, December 11th, Justice Lametti indicated that he was eager to reopen the law and will consider going even further than the court requires, particularly with regard to adults with cognitive impairment and some minors as well as the possibility of advance directives.
  • Also ahead: In June 2020, the Liberal government begins a mandatory review of the current regime for physician-assisted death, which came into force in June 2016.
  • Possible expansion of Quebec legislation regarding medical aid in dying: A 150-page report, written by a Quebec government commission mandated to examine the possibility of expanding access to medical aid in dying to patients incapable of decision-making, was tabled by Minister Danielle McCann. It includes recommendations that the law allow individuals to make advance directives requesting a doctor-assisted death, which is not allowed under current law.
  • Quebec to hold public consultations on expanding criteria for medically assisted dying law Health Minister Danielle McCann announced on November 29th the launch of public consultations before the 2022 election on expanding criteria for medically assisted deaths in Quebec, led by a panel of 22 experts, The proposed expansion could allow the medically assisted death of people with Alzheimer’s disease and other degenerative conditions.

4th Annual Report of the Commission on End-of-Life Care (available in French only):

Extension of rights for specialized nurse practitioners in Quebec:

Alberta Bill 207 (2019):

Latest update:

Information:

Commentaries:

“…where conscience is protected, we are able to exercise moral freedom — making deep and significant moral judgements independent of government….They encounter a host of moral and ethical considerations daily, making moral judgements more often than most other professions. This is why doctors need legal protections for their conscience rights.”

“Protection of conscience has a strong moral and intellectual basis…If a person can be compelled to accept the state’s notion of right and wrong regardless of his or her own conscience, then what is left of the notion of individual freedom?”

Across the border:

National Council on Disability (NCD) Quality-Adjusted-Life Report

  • Quality-Adjusted Life Years and the Devaluation of Life with Disability Report is part of a five-report series on the intersection of disability and bioethics. This report, and the others in the series, “focuses on how the historical and continued devaluation of the lives of people with disabilities by the medical community, legislators, researchers, and even health economists, perpetuates unequal access to medical care, including lifesaving care.”

INTERNATIONAL NEWS:

New Zealand passes law legalizing euthanasia:

DOCTORS’ VOICES:

COMMENTARIES:

“We have set up medical and legal frameworks that enable sick, old and disabled people to access death, and our de facto policy is not to monitor whether we could have helped them to live. Since “what gets measured gets done,” this depoliticized picture of MAiD as oppression-free excuses us from doing anything.”

  • Responses (available in French only) to Luc Ferrandez’s suggestion of euthanasia as a social and economical solution:
    Bravo to Nathalie Elgrably-Lévy and Mathieu Bock-Côté for their apt responses to Mr. Luc Ferrandez’ eugenic solution for the social and economic problems of our world today. Elgrably-Lévy rightfully points out that Mr. Fernandez’s question (Whether we could, for environmental, social and economic reasons, decide that we want to receive medical aid in dying so as not to constitute a burden for our family and society in general?) reveals not only the absence of humanist values but an absence of humanity! “… isn’t it ironic to hear a champion of solidarity and compassion call a patient a “burden“?”

  • Contemplating the Hippocratic Oath and Physician-Assisted Suicide

“The Hippocratic Oath rightly prohibits doctors from giving deadly drugs, even if autonomous patients ask for them. By assisting in the suicide of a terminally ill patient who wants to determine the manner of his death, the physician inappropriately medicalizes mortality itself. He also jeopardizes the welfare of other vulnerable patients.”

RESOURCES:

IN THE LITERATURE:

  • Psychological Injury and Law (2019) p1-15. Available online since 15 November 2019. Determination of Competency for High-Gravity Life-Death Decision-Making. Schultz, I.Z., Stewart, A.M. & Sepehry, A.A.

****************************

VOLUNTEERS NEEDED!

The Physicians’ Alliance against Euthanasia is looking for volunteers to translate texts from English to French. Professional translation certification is not mandatory, but an excellent level of written French and some experience with translation is required. If you would like to support our work by volunteering as a translator, please write to us at info@collectifmedecins.org.

0

About the Author: